I’m on a bit of a Super 14 roll, so let’s keep it going.
Kind of like use it or lose it.
When the Super 12 kicked off it was all so new and we ruled the world and we showed them how rugby could be played. Bugger me, did we what.
But i bet when the fishheads who came up with bonus points were thinking through all their scenarios, not once did they think that a team could get blotted – not score a single point – and yet still score a bonus point.
Nor did anyone think a team could be dicked by around 30 points and yet still score bonus point.
See where are we heading with this?
If anyone was reading this, they may be able to help because I can’t think of any other serious competition where bonus points play such a role.
In the big four American pro sports, as far I tell, there’s no bonus points. You win or you lose. Americans simply hate draws because there isn’t a winner so they’re hardly likely to get excited about scoring a bonus point for a glorious 0-6 loss!
EPL – win, lose, draw.
NRL – win, lose, and only draw when the we’ve played extra time.
Imagine if golf gave bonus points for longest drives or closest to the pin.
Anyway, that’s one side of the argument.
The other point is how the table is distorted by the impact of the bonus points. Let’s look at a little something I whipped up out the back showing what would happen if we went back to the good old tried and true system of 2 points for a win and 1 for a draw (as with the NRL).
The current position of each team is in the first column, followed by team name, games played, wins, draws, losses, points diff, bonus points 1 (losses 7 points or less), bonus points 2 (4+ tries) and finally total points. Teams are ranked by points and then points diff.
| Pos |
Team |
P |
W |
D |
L |
Diff |
B1 |
B2 |
Pts |
| 2 |
Sharks |
10 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
40 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
| 1 |
Chiefs |
9 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
83 |
3 |
4 |
12 |
| 3 |
Bulls |
9 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
48 |
2 |
3 |
12 |
| 4 |
Hurricanes |
9 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
33 |
2 |
3 |
12 |
| 6 |
Waratahs |
10 |
6 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
12 |
| 7 |
Brumbies |
9 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
-3 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
| 8 |
Crusaders |
9 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
11 |
| 5 |
Blues |
9 |
5 |
0 |
4 |
19 |
2 |
6 |
10 |
| 9 |
Western Force |
9 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
11 |
2 |
3 |
9 |
| 10 |
Highlanders |
9 |
4 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
| 11 |
Lions |
9 |
3 |
0 |
6 |
-72 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
| 12 |
Stormers |
9 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
-14 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
| 13 |
Reds |
9 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
-61 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
| 14 |
Cheetahs |
9 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
-112 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
The Bonus Point system simply doesn’t reward the best teams.
The Sharks have won the most games but are second to the Chiefs who’ve clocked up the most bonus points altho admittedly the Sharks have played a game extra.
The Blues however are undoubtedly the biggest winners – they’re currently fifth on the table yet if we go with the old and improved that’s how we did it in the old days point system, they would drop down to 8th. Amazingly, the Blues on 5 wins are ahead of TWO teams who’ve won six games – the Tahs and Brumbies.
I’ll repeat the activity once the final round robin games have been played to see what difference the bonus points have made.